z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is Blood Superior to Crystalloid Cardioplegia?
Author(s) -
Veena Guru,
John D. Omura,
Abdullah A. Alghamdi,
Richard D. Weisel,
Stephen E. Fremes
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.105.001644
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , randomized controlled trial , confidence interval , myocardial infarction , meta analysis , incidence (geometry) , clinical trial , anesthesia , adverse effect , relative risk , cardiology , surgery , physics , optics
Many small, randomized, controlled trials have evaluated the effectiveness of blood as compared with crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection during cardiac surgery. Blood cardioplegia provides a closer approximation to normal physiology, which may translate into measurable clinical benefits. This meta-analysis describes the effectiveness of blood cardioplegia in lowering adverse postoperative outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom