z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Short-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Isolated Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Mediastinal Radiation-Associated Severe Aortic Stenosis
Author(s) -
Victor Nauffal,
Camden P. Bay,
Pinak Shah,
Piotr Sobieszczyk,
Tsuyoshi Kaneko,
Patrick T. O’Gara,
Anju Nohria
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
circulation cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.621
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1941-7632
pISSN - 1941-7640
DOI - 10.1161/circinterventions.120.010009
Subject(s) - medicine , stenosis , aortic valve replacement , cardiology , aortic valve , valve replacement , radiology , surgery
Background: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with radiation-associated aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may improve outcomes in this population. Methods: We evaluated 1668 TAVR and 2611 patients with SAVR enrolled in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons’ database between 2011 and 2018. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare 30- day outcomes between TAVR and SAVR. Propensity-matched analysis was performed to confirm results of the overall cohort. Additionally, the cohort was stratified into early (2011–2014) versus contemporary (2015–2018) TAVR eras, and 30-day outcomes for TAVR and SAVR were compared. Finally, outcomes with transfemoral TAVR versus SAVR were compared. Results: In the overall cohort, TAVR was associated with significantly reduced 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]TAVR/SAVR =0.60 [0.40–0.91]). Postoperative atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, pleural effusion, renal failure, and bleeding also occurred less frequently with TAVR. Stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA; ORTAVR/SAVR , 2.03 [1.09–3.77]) and pacemaker implantation (ORTAVR/SAVR , 1.62 [1.21–2.17]) were higher with TAVR. Propensity-matched analysis yielded similar results as the overall cohort. Following stratification by era, TAVR versus SAVR was associated with reduced 30-day mortality in the contemporary but not early era (OREarly , 0.78 [0.48–1.28]; ORContemporary , 0.31 [0.14–0.65]). Pacemaker implantation was higher with TAVR versus SAVR in both eras (OREarly , 1.60 [1.03–2.46]; ORContemporary , 1.64 [1.10–2.45]). There was also a nonsignificant trend towards increased stroke/TIA with TAVR during both eras (OREarly , 1.39 [0.58–3.36]; ORContemporary , 2.46 [0.99–6.10]). Finally, transfemoral TAVR (N=1369) versus SAVR revealed similar findings as the overall cohort; however, the association of TAVR with stroke/TIA was not statistically significant (ORStroke/TIA , 1.57 [0.79–3.09]).Conclusions: TAVR provides an effective and evolving alternative to SAVR for radiation-associated severe aortic stenosis and was associated with lower 30-day mortality and postoperative complications. TAVR was associated with increased pacemaker implantation and a trend towards increased stroke/TIA. In this unique population with extensive valvular and vascular calcifications, the risk of stroke/TIA with TAVR requires careful consideration and further investigation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom