Comparison Between 1- and 2-Stent Strategies in Unprotected Distal Left Main Disease | Zendy

Kensuke Takagi | Zendy; Toru Naganuma | Zendy; Alaide Chieffo | Zendy; Yusuke Fujino | Zendy; Azeem Latib | Zendy; Satoko Tahara | Zendy; Hisaaki Ishiguro | Zendy; Matteo Montorfano | Zendy; Mauro Carlino | Zendy; Hiroyoshi Kawamoto | Zendy; Naoyuki Kurita | Zendy; Koji Hozawa | Zendy; Shotaro Nakamura | Zendy; Sunao Nakamura | Zendy; Antonio Colombo | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison Between 1- and 2-Stent Strategies in Unprotected Distal Left Main Disease

Author(s) -

Kensuke Takagi,

Toru Naganuma,

Alaide Chieffo,

Yusuke Fujino,

Azeem Latib,

Satoko Tahara,

Hisaaki Ishiguro,

Matteo Montorfano,

Mauro Carlino,

Hiroyoshi Kawamoto,

Naoyuki Kurita,

Koji Hozawa,

Shotaro Nakamura,

Sunao Nakamura,

Antonio Colombo

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

circulation cardiovascular interventions

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.621

H-Index - 95

eISSN - 1941-7632

pISSN - 1941-7640

DOI - 10.1161/circinterventions.116.003359

Subject(s) - hazard ratio , medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , cardiology , myocardial infarction , confidence interval , stent , coronary artery disease , restenosis , drug eluting stent , surgery

There are only little data available on the comparison of clinical outcomes between a 1-stent strategy (1-SS) and a 2-stent strategy (2-SS) for percutaneous coronary intervention in unprotected distal left main disease.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research