Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Compared With Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients | Zendy

Stefano Rosato | Zendy; Francesco Santini | Zendy; Marco Barbanti | Zendy; Fausto Biancari | Zendy; Paola D’Errigo | Zendy; Francesco Onorati | Zendy; Corrado Tamburino | Zendy; Marco Ranucci | Zendy; Remo Daniel Covello | Zendy; Gennaro Santoro | Zendy; Claudio Grossi | Zendy; Martina Ventura | Zendy; Danilo Fusco | Zendy; Fulvia Seccareccia | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Compared With Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients

Author(s) -

Stefano Rosato,

Francesco Santini,

Marco Barbanti,

Fausto Biancari,

Paola D’Errigo,

Francesco Onorati,

Corrado Tamburino,

Marco Ranucci,

Remo Daniel Covello,

Gennaro Santoro,

Claudio Grossi,

Martina Ventura,

Danilo Fusco,

Fulvia Seccareccia

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

circulation cardiovascular interventions

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.621

H-Index - 95

eISSN - 1941-7632

pISSN - 1941-7640

DOI - 10.1161/circinterventions.115.003326

Subject(s) - medicine , aortic valve replacement , cardiology , cardiogenic shock , stenosis , euroscore , aortic valve stenosis , stroke (engine) , propensity score matching , surgery , myocardial infarction , cardiac surgery , mechanical engineering , engineering

The proven efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in high-risk patients is leading to the expansion of its indications toward lower-risk patients. However, this shift is not supported by meaningful evidence of its benefit over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This analysis aims to describe outcomes of TAVI versus SAVR in low-risk patients

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research