Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease | Zendy

Sripal Bangalore | Zendy; Bora Toklu | Zendy; Jørn Wetterslev | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

Author(s) -

Sripal Bangalore,

Bora Toklu,

Jørn Wetterslev

Publication year - 2015

Publication title -

circulation cardiovascular interventions

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.621

H-Index - 95

eISSN - 1941-7632

pISSN - 1941-7640

DOI - 10.1161/circinterventions.114.002142

Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , cardiology , myocardial infarction , revascularization , culprit , confidence interval , coronary artery disease , randomized controlled trial , relative risk

The 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction gives a class III indication for nonculprit artery percutaneous coronary intervention at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention, driven by data from observational studies. However, more recent trials suggest otherwise.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research