z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prohealing Endothelial Progenitor Cell Capture Stents
Author(s) -
Jane A. Leopold
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
circulation cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.621
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1941-7632
pISSN - 1941-7640
DOI - 10.1161/circinterventions.113.000812
Subject(s) - endothelial progenitor cell , progenitor cell , progenitor , endothelial stem cell , stem cell , microbiology and biotechnology , chemistry , biology , biochemistry , in vitro
Since the early days of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, it has been recognized that balloon inflation disrupts the endothelial monolayer and injures normal arterial segments.1 This initiates a repair process that is mediated by platelets, inflammatory cells, and circulating progenitor cells that are recruited to sites of injury. There has been recent interest in the prohealing properties of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). Early studies identified these cells by expression of the surface antigen CD34 and demonstrated that they promoted reendothelialization after balloon injury.2,3 Because of the fact that these cells are relatively rare in the circulation (0.005%–0.01% of the total white blood cell count), it is not surprising that a stent was designed to capture circulating EPCs and sequester the cells to promote rapid reendothelialization, to decrease thrombogenicity, and to prevent restenosis.4 To accomplish this, the stent incorporated a monoclonal CD34 antibody in a proprietary polysaccharide intermediate coating that was adhered to a stainless steel stent; in 2010, the stent platform was changed to cobalt chromium.5The safety and efficacy of the EPC capture stent have been studied extensively in clinical registries and randomized trials. The Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth (HEALING) registries established a safety profile for the stent but demonstrated what would become a common theme; the stent did not decrease late lumen loss (LLL) to the same degree observed for drug-eluting stents (DES). This finding was attributed initially to variation in the number of circulating EPCs because of differences in the use …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom