Long-Term Follow-Up of Early Versus Delayed Invasive Approach After Fibrinolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction | Zendy

Yvonne P. Clever | Zendy; Bodo Cremers | Zendy; Andreas Link | Zendy; Michael Böhm | Zendy; Bruno Scheller | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Long-Term Follow-Up of Early Versus Delayed Invasive Approach After Fibrinolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Author(s) -

Yvonne P. Clever,

Bodo Cremers,

Andreas Link,

Michael Böhm,

Bruno Scheller

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

circulation cardiovascular interventions

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.621

H-Index - 95

eISSN - 1941-7632

pISSN - 1941-7640

DOI - 10.1161/circinterventions.111.962316

Subject(s) - conventional pci , medicine , fibrinolysis , percutaneous coronary intervention , myocardial infarction , cardiology , timi

Optimal reperfusion strategy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is controversial. Failure of fibrinolytic therapy is related to limited efficacy, high reocclusion rates, reinfarction, and systemic bleeding complications. Data on the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after fibrinolysis are conflicting. The Southwest German Interventional Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (SIAM III) evaluated the effects of transfer for early PCI in acute ST-elevation-myocardial infarction compared with a delayed PCI strategy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research