z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mehran Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Risk Score Predicts Short- and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST-Elevation–Myocardial Infarction
Author(s) -
Fabio Sgura,
Luca Bertelli,
Daniel Monopoli,
Chiara Leuzzi,
E Guerri,
I Sparta,
Luigi Politi,
Alessandro Aprile,
Andrea Amato,
Rosario Rossi,
Giuseppe BiondiZoccai,
Giuseppe Sangiorgi,
Maria Grazia Modena
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
circulation cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.621
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1941-7632
pISSN - 1941-7640
DOI - 10.1161/circinterventions.110.955310
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , hazard ratio , myocardial infarction , contrast induced nephropathy , cardiology , confidence interval , framingham risk score , proportional hazards model , risk factor , disease
Background— The Mehran Risk Score (MRS) has been demonstrated to be clinically useful for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention. We aim to validate the MRS in the setting of Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for prediction of both CIN and short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Methods and Results— We assigned 891 consecutive patients with ST-elevation–myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention to 4 groups of risk of CIN (RC) according to MRS (low, medium, high, and very high risk). We evaluated CIN, death, and major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after 25 months' mean follow-up. At multivariable analysis, mortality in very high-risk group was more than 10-fold higher (hazard ratio [HR], 10.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.83 to 21.1;P <0.001) when compared with the low-risk group and was also increased in the high-risk group (HR, 6.31; 95% CI, 3.28 to 12.14;P <0.001) and medium-risk group (HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.83 to 5.51;P <0.001). Similarly, an increasing effect was seen across MRS strata for major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events both in the very high-risk group (HR, 3.79; 95% CI, 2.27 to 6.6.32;P <0.001), high-risk group (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.75;P =0.001), and medium-risk group (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.85;P =0.007). In addition, the HR for rehospitalization increased with the increasing RC groups (HR, 3.32; 95%CI, 1.96 to 5.63;P <0.001; HR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.35 to 7.20;P =0.008; HR, 7.73; 95% CI, 2.97 to 20.10;P <0.001, respectively). The odds ratio for CIN was 2.84 (95% CI, 1.16 to 6.92;P =0.021) in the very high RC group, 1.33 (95% CI, 0.68 to 2.61;P =0.398) in the high RC group, and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.79;P =0.699) in the medium RC group, as compared with the lower one.Conclusions— The MRS may be applied in the primary angioplasty setting population and is able to predict CIN and to stratify patients for poor clinical outcomes both in the short- and long-term follow-up.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom