z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Aerodynamics in Cardiac CT
Author(s) -
Koen Nieman,
Pim J. de Feijter
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
circulation cardiovascular imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.584
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 1942-0080
pISSN - 1941-9651
DOI - 10.1161/circimaging.113.001209
Subject(s) - medicine , coronary artery disease , cardiology , radiology , cardiac catheterization , erasmus+ , cath lab , clinical cardiology , interventional cardiology , coronary atherosclerosis , myocardial infarction , conventional pci , art , the renaissance , art history
It seems not long ago that invasive coronary angiography was considered as the undisputed diagnostic standard and management determining test for patients with ischemic heart disease. Registry data have shown that reliance on noninvasive testing for myocardial ischemia, positioned as a gatekeeper to restrict referral to the catheterization laboratory, is far from optimal in clinical practice.1 Coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography (CCTA), which was developed and validated during the past decade, allows noninvasive visual confirmation of the presence or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Meanwhile the cardiology community has rediscovered an appreciation for functional parameters of CAD, particularly for clinical decision making. Cardiac CT is arguably the most accurate noninvasive technique to exclude CAD, with sensitivities and negative predictive values >95% as reported in meta-analyses.2 Unfortunately, CCTA has a tendency to overestimate the severity of CAD, particularly in the presence of coronary calcifications. More than ever before, we are aware of the complex and unpredictable relation between angiographic stenosis and myocardial ischemia. Compared with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFRcath), which is currently considered as the clinical standard of lesion-specific hemodynamic significance, both invasive and noninvasive coronary angiography overestimate the functional severity of CAD.3,4 Current clinical practice guidelines recommend consideration of both anatomic and functional parameters in the treatment of stable CAD. There seems to be no prognostic benefit from revascularizing hemodynamically nonsignificant stenosis, whereas on the other hand, mechanical treatment of myocardial ischemia is difficult in the absence of focal narrowing of the epicardial coronary branches. In that context, a diagnostic modality able to provide both angiographic and functional information during a single, noninvasive examination would be highly desirable.Article see p 881For decades, (computer) simulations of air flow around objects have defined the design of aircrafts and automobiles. Based on the …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom