Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Bovine Pericardial Aortic Valves | Zendy

Satish J Chacko | Zendy; Asimul H. Ansari | Zendy; Patrick M. McCarthy | Zendy; S. Chris Malaisrie | Zendy; AdinCristian Andrei | Zendy; Zhi Li | Zendy; Richard Lee | Zendy; Edwin C. McGee | Zendy; Robert O. Bonow | Zendy; Jyothy Puthumana | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Bovine Pericardial Aortic Valves

Author(s) -

Satish J Chacko,

Asimul H. Ansari,

Patrick M. McCarthy,

S. Chris Malaisrie,

AdinCristian Andrei,

Zhi Li,

Richard Lee,

Edwin C. McGee,

Robert O. Bonow,

Jyothy Puthumana

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

circulation cardiovascular imaging

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.584

H-Index - 99

eISSN - 1942-0080

pISSN - 1941-9651

DOI - 10.1161/circimaging.112.000319

Subject(s) - medicine , aortic valve replacement , cardiology , prosthesis , aortic valve , surgery , stenosis

The prevalence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and its impact on survival after aortic valve replacement have not been clearly defined. Historically, the presence of PPM was identified from postoperative echocardiograms or preoperative manufacturer-provided charts, resulting in wide discrepancies. The 2009 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines proposed an algorithmic approach to calculate PPM. This study compared PPM prevalence and its impact on survival using 3 modalities: (1) the ASE guidelines-suggested algorithm (ASE PPM); (2) the manufacturer-provided charts (M PPM); and (3) the echocardiographically measured, body surface area-indexed, effective orifice area (EOAi PPM) measurement.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research