z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Supplement to the AHA Guidelines for the Management of Transient Ischemic Attacks
Author(s) -
Seemant Chaturvedi
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/01.str.31.4.983
Subject(s) - medicine , carotid endarterectomy , context (archaeology) , stenosis , endarterectomy , clinical trial , stroke (engine) , general surgery , surgery , mechanical engineering , paleontology , engineering , biology
To the Editor: I read with interest the recent supplement to the guidelines on management of patients with transient ischemic attacks.1 However, with regard to carotid endarterectomy (CE), I was disappointed that Albers et al made no attempt to interpret the clinical trial results in the context of real-world surgical performance.For example, in the updated section on CE for 50% to 69% symptomatic stenosis, the authors state that symptomatic patients with 50% to 69% benefit from surgery and that these patients should be considered for CE. However, should clinicians conclude that because patients in the surgical arm of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) had a marginal statistically significant benefit ( P =0.045) that this result is clinically meaningful and that this can be routinely achieved in clinical practice?One must keep in mind that the benefit of surgery in the 50% to 69% group was very modest. For the …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom