z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A secondary prevention, randomized trial of suloctidil in patients with a recent history of thromboembolic stroke.
Author(s) -
Michael Gent,
J. A. Blakely,
V C Hachinski,
R S Roberts,
Henry J.M. Barnett,
Neville Bayer,
S. George Carruthers,
Stephen M. Collins,
Magdalena Gaweł,
M Giroux-Klimek
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/01.str.16.3.416
Subject(s) - medicine , stroke (engine) , placebo , myocardial infarction , randomized controlled trial , clinical trial , incidence (geometry) , surgery , mechanical engineering , physics , alternative medicine , optics , pathology , engineering
Four hundred and thirty-eight patients who had suffered a thromboembolic stroke not less than two weeks or more than four months previously, were entered into a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial to determine whether suloctidil (200 mg t.i.d.) would influence the subsequent recurrence of stroke, the occurrence of myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death. The two treatment groups were comparable at baseline with respect to important prognostic variables and there was good adherence to the study protocol during an average follow-up of 20 months. Significantly more patients complained of side-effects in the suloctidil group and more hepatotoxicity was also reported in the suloctidil group. Four cases of clinical hepatitis were suspected to be due to suloctidil, each of which was reversible on termination of study treatment; relative increases in SGOT and SGPT at three months in the suloctidil group were found to be mild and transient. The primary analysis of efficacy was based on the incidence of the first event of stroke, myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death, but excluding events that occurred more than 28 days after complete withdrawal from study medication for whatever reason. Thus, the primary analysis included 38 events in the suloctidil group and 47 in the placebo group (p = 0.17) representing a risk reduction of 24%. If total mortality is substituted for cardiovascular death, the corresponding figures are 47 in the suloctidil group and 58 in the placebo group (p = 0.08).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom