z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Ineffectiveness of the Doppler Ophthalmic Test (DOT) in post-endarterectomy evaluation.
Author(s) -
Shirley M. Otis,
Richard A. Smith,
Donald J. Dalessio,
Alan Kroll,
Matthew N. Rush,
Ralph B. Dilley
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/01.str.10.4.396
Subject(s) - medicine , carotid endarterectomy , ophthalmic artery , stenosis , radiology , endarterectomy , auscultation , doppler effect , blood flow , surgery , physics , astronomy
In an effort to evaluate the effectiveness of the Doppler Ophthalmic Test (DOT) following carotid endarterectomy, a large group of patients was examined both pre- and postoperatively with non-invasive techniques. The DOT, which has proven to be a useful non-invasive diagnostic test for the determination of significant carotid artery stenosis, was found to be persistently abnormal in 46% of patients with a preoperative positive test. This occurred in spite of the fact that operative arteriography, direct ultrasonic auscultation, and Doppler imaging studies were all within normal limits. It is suggested from this study that the Doppler Ophthalmic Test alone is not adequate to follow patients postoperatively, especially if an abnormal study persists following a satisfactory endarterectomy. Other non-invasive techniques, which employ direct ultrasonic imaging of the carotid flow, may be more accurate in determining vessel patency.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom