Treatment of prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Immediate countershock versus high-dose epinephrine and CPR preceding countershock.
Author(s) -
James T. Niemann,
Charles B. Cairns,
J Sharma,
Roger Lewis
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/01.cir.85.1.281
Subject(s) - medicine , ventricular fibrillation , coronary perfusion pressure , cardiopulmonary resuscitation , anesthesia , cardiology , defibrillation , asystole , resuscitation
Early countershock of ventricular fibrillation has been shown to improve immediate and long-term outcome of cardiac arrest. However, a number of investigations in the laboratory and in the clinical population indicate that immediate countershock of prolonged ventricular fibrillation most commonly is followed by asystole or a nonperfusing spontaneous cardiac rhythm, neither of which rarely respond to current therapy. The use of epinephrine in doses greater than those currently recommended has recently been shown to improve both cerebral and myocardial perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The purpose of this study was to compare cardiac resuscitation outcome between immediate countershock of prolonged ventricular fibrillation with high-dose epinephrine therapy and conventional CPR before countershock of prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a canine model.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom