Comparison of prazosin with hydralazine in patients receiving hydrochlorothiazide. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
Author(s) -
Lippincott Williams Wilkins
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/01.cir.64.4.772
Subject(s) - medicine , prazosin , hydrochlorothiazide , hydralazine , blood pressure , randomized controlled trial , randomization , orthostatic vital signs , heart rate , cardiology , pulse pressure , diastole , anesthesia , antagonist , receptor
The antihypertensive efficacy and the incidence of side effects of prazosin and hydralazine were compared in a randomized, double-blind trial in 232 adult male hypertensives who could not be controlled with hydrochlorothiazide alone. There were no significant differences between regimens in the percentage of patients who attained goal blood pressure (reduction of diastolic blood pressure to below 90 mm Hg and at least 5 mm less than the baseline randomization pressure), effect on pulse rate or the incidence or reasons for terminations. Absolute reduction of blood pressure was similar for both drugs except for sitting systolic pressure at 3 and 6 months, when prazosin effected a 3.7- and 3.6-mm Hg greater response (p less than 0.05). Orthostatic dizziness (p less than 0.005), sexual dysfunction (p less than 0.02), and nightmares (p less than 0.02) were more frequent with prazosin than with hydralazine; nevertheless, patient compliance was similar for both drugs. An unexpected finding was the lack of pulse rate increase associated with hydralazine, particularly in older patients.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom