z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Should lidocaine be administered routinely to all patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Author(s) -
Donald C. Harrison
Publication year - 1978
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/01.cir.58.4.581
Subject(s) - medicine , lidocaine , myocardial infarction , cardiology , anesthesia
For more than 10 years, coronary care units have used electrocardiographic monitoring for detecting and treating life-threatening arrhythmias in patients who have had acute myocardial infarction. With this experience as background, it is opportune to reassess some of the principles that are used in many coronary care units for treating these patients. Some investigators question whether all patients with acute infarction should receive antiarrhythmic drugs routinely to prevent primary ventricular fibrillation. The purpose of this editorial is to review this concept.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom