English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Diastolic properties of the left ventricle (LV) are probably influenced by several factors, including completeness of ventricular relaxation, composition of the ventricular wall, and wall thickness. This study has utilized a combined ultrasonic and hemodynamic technique to examine the influence of LV posterior wall thickness at end diastole (hp) on LV diastolic characteristics in 24 patients with various forms of heart disease. The slope of late diastolic LV pressure-diameter relations (&Dgr;P/&Dgr;D) was calculated and used as a measure of effective diastolic stiffness (S) late in diastole. S was normalized for average LV pressure during the interval of measurement (P) as S/P, called SN. LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), volume index (LVEDVI), and mass index (LVMI) were measured in each patient during the same study at which hp, S and SN were determined.The range of hp was 5.6 to 18.6 mm; it was highest in a patient with aortic stenosis, and lowest in those with mitral stenosis. Linear regression of hp against S, SN and LVEDP showed significant correlation, with r = 0.85, 0.75, and 0.74 respectively (P < 0.001 for each regression analysis). Poor correlation was noted with LVEDVI, &Dgr;P, and &Dgr;D. Of 12 patients with LV hypertrophy (LVH) by ECG, four had normal hp (7.9 ± 1.0 mm) and eight had abnormal hp (13 ± 0.6 mm). Those with normal hp had nearly normal values for S (3.5 ± 0.5 mm Hg/mm) while those with abnormal hp showed significant increases in S (7.7 ± 1.5 mm Hg/mm), indicating that LVH may alter S only insofar as there is an associated increase in hp. Consistent with this was the observation that within the group of patients having increased LVMI, LVMI itself was a poor predictor of S (r = 0.50, NS) while hp remained an excellent predictor of S (r = 0.86, P < 0.001). In summary, this study suggests that wall thickness is an important determinant of left ventricular diastolic stiffness and pressure, and that wall thickness appears to predict diastolic stiffness independent of the presence or absence of LVH or increased LV mass.

Wall Thickness and Diastolic Properties of the Left Ventricle