Probability of Major Depression Classification Based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI Diagnostic Interviews: A Synthesis of Three Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses | Zendy

Yin Wu | Zendy; Brooke Levis | Zendy; John P. A. Ioannidis | Zendy; Andrea Benedetti | Zendy; Brett D. Thombs | Zendy

Open Access

Probability of Major Depression Classification Based on the SCID, CIDI, and MINI Diagnostic Interviews: A Synthesis of Three Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses

Author(s) -

Yin Wu,

Brooke Levis,

John P. A. Ioannidis,

Andrea Benedetti,

Brett D. Thombs

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

psychotherapy and psychosomatics

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.531

H-Index - 98

eISSN - 1423-0348

pISSN - 0033-3190

DOI - 10.1159/000509283

Subject(s) - cidi , depression (economics) , odds ratio , confidence interval , odds , medicine , meta analysis , psychiatry , psychology , clinical psychology , logistic regression , comorbidity , national comorbidity survey , economics , macroeconomics

Three previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) reported that, compared to the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID), alternative reference standards, primarily the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), tended to misclassify major depression status, when controlling for depression symptom severity. However, there was an important lack of precision in the results.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research