Early or Late Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Children: Practical Implications of the PEPaNIC Trial
Author(s) -
Olivier Goulet,
Frank Jochum,
Berthold Koletzko
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
annals of nutrition and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.926
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1421-9697
pISSN - 0250-6807
DOI - 10.1159/000455336
Subject(s) - parenteral nutrition , critically ill , intensive care medicine , medicine , critical illness , pediatrics
come) may have been biased. A 3 days shorter duration of mechanical ventilation ( p = 0.01) and a 4.1 day shorter hospital stay ( p = 0.005) were also observed with EarlyPN. Mortality was similar in both groups, but hypoglycemia was more frequent with LatePN (9.1%) vs. EarlyPN (4.8%, p = 0.001). The authors conclude that withholding PN for 1 week is advantageous in critically ill children. Based on the previous experience with the EPaNIC trial in adult ICU patients [6] , we consider it likely that these findings will invigorate the controversy about potential harm of early sPN. However, several important points and questions related to the PEPaNIC trial arise, including the selection and heterogeneity of included patients and the choices taken regarding nutrition and glucose control management.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom