English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Furthermore, the latter experience has been reported by researchers working in different countries [8, 9] . Therefore, considering the information and definitions of key subclinical anatomical lesions (pseudocyst, fluid collection, fistulous tract) in HS that have been described by imaging, particularly color Doppler ultrasound in the adult and pediatric population [8, 10] , the initial clinical discordance between experts reported by Lipsker et al. [1] is not surprising. Moreover, the difficulty of achieving common definitions on just clinically based examinations or staging systems that could match the actual anatomical abnormalities with their exact spatial positioning and volumetric features is also to be expected. Therefore, from the imaging point of view, the usage of an anatomically based common terminology in HS that could bring together the experience of a multispecialist team with clinicians, imaging professionals and pathologists may perhaps simplify the task in the future.

Reply to Lipsker et al. and Revuz on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Terminology: The Imaging Point of View