Ingenol Mebutate vs. Daylight Photodynamic Therapy in a Kidney Transplant Recipient

We present the case of a 73-year-old male patient who had received a first renal transplant at 36 years and a second one at the age of 55 years. He is currently under immunosuppression with everolimus 2.5 mg/day and prednisone 5 mg/day. The patient presented with multiple actinic keratoses on both cheeks and the forehead and received treatment by ingenol mebutate 150 µg/g gel daily on 3 consecutive days on his right cheek and methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) photodynamic therapy activated by daylight (MAL-dPDT) on the forehead and the left cheek. MAL-dPDT treatment proved a feasible, repeatable, physician-directed method of treating field cancerization with limited morbidity for a period of 6 days. Treatment with ingenol mebutate gel was a feasible, possibly self-directed method of treating field cancerization with limited morbidity for 10 days in this immunosuppressed patient. Both treatments showed similar efficacy. At the time of treatment, the MAL daylight PDT ran at 3 times the cost of ingenol mebutate gel.