How to Distinguish between Statistically Significant Results and Clinically Relevant Results
Author(s) -
Derrick Bennett
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
monographs in clinical neuroscience/frontiers of neurology and neuroscience/monographs in neural sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1420-2441
pISSN - 0300-5186
DOI - 10.1159/000445411
Subject(s) - generalizability theory , clinical trial , medicine , dilemma , randomized controlled trial , relevance (law) , medical physics , psychology , pathology , epistemology , developmental psychology , political science , law , philosophy
A practicing clinician will often be confronted with the results of a new clinical trial in their relevant field and will be faced with the dilemma of determining whether these results are clinically relevant to their own work. This chapter aims to describe the concepts of statistical significance in randomized clinical trials from a mainly classical statistical inference perspective. This chapter describes approaches to assess clinical significance and illustrates these approaches with examples from the contemporary neurological literature.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom