A Prospective Study of the Intra- and Postoperative Efficacy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spinal Cord Stimulation | Zendy

Steven G. Roth | Zendy; Steven Lange | Zendy; Jessica Haller | Zendy; Priscilla De La Cruz | Zendy; Vignessh Kumar | Zendy; Meghan Wilock | Zendy; Stephen Paniccioli | Zendy; Michael Briotte | Zendy; Julie G. Pilitsis | Zendy

Open Access

A Prospective Study of the Intra- and Postoperative Efficacy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spinal Cord Stimulation

Author(s) -

Steven G. Roth,

Steven Lange,

Jessica Haller,

Priscilla De La Cruz,

Vignessh Kumar,

Meghan Wilock,

Stephen Paniccioli,

Michael Briotte,

Julie G. Pilitsis

Publication year - 2015

Publication title -

stereotactic and functional neurosurgery

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.798

H-Index - 63

eISSN - 1423-0372

pISSN - 1011-6125

DOI - 10.1159/000437388

Subject(s) - medicine , prospective cohort study , somatosensory evoked potential , anesthesia , electromyography , visual analogue scale , oswestry disability index , spinal cord stimulation , physical medicine and rehabilitation , gold standard (test) , intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring , physical therapy , stimulation , surgery , low back pain , radiology , alternative medicine , pathology

Accurate lead placement is critical for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) efficacy. The traditional gold standard of awake placement is often technically difficult. While there is retrospective evidence supporting the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) as an alternative, a prospective assessment has not yet been performed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research