Screening for Bipolar Disorder: Confusion between Case-Finding and Screening
Author(s) -
Mark Zimmerman
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
psychotherapy and psychosomatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.531
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1423-0348
pISSN - 0033-3190
DOI - 10.1159/000362564
Subject(s) - confusion , bipolar disorder , psychology , psychiatry , psychotherapist , clinical psychology , psychoanalysis , cognition
hypomanic or manic episodes must be elicited. Recommendations for improving the detection of bipolar disorder include careful clinical evaluations, inquiring about a history of mania and hypomania, and the use of screening questionnaires [11–13] . Many scales have been developed to assess manic/hypomanic symptoms. Some of these instruments are crosssectional measures of symptom severity, and, prior to DSM-5, would not have been appropriate as diagnostic aids in currently depressed patients. The reason for the caveat regarding DSM-5 is because DSM-5 includes a mixed feature specifier for depressed patients which these scales might be useful in identifying. In the past few years, 4 self-report questionnaires have been developed to screen for bipolar disorder [14–17] . That is, they assess a lifetime history of manic/hypomanic symptoms. The purpose of the present article is twofold. First, I briefly describe the structure and content of these 4 scales and summarize the initial studies establishing the cutoff score derived by the scale developers that was recommended to screen for bipolar disorder. Second, I discuss the distinction between case-finding and screening, how this distinction is reflected in the derivation of a measure’s cutoff score, and examine how this applies to the 4 bipolar disorder screening instruments. Introduction
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom