Validity of Self-Reported versus Hospital-Coded Diagnosis of Stroke: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study | Zendy

Euzebiusz Jamrozik | Zendy; Zoë Hyde | Zendy; Helman Alfonso | Zendy; Leon Flicker | Zendy; Osvaldo P. Almeida | Zendy; Bu B. Yeap | Zendy; Paul E. Norman | Zendy; Graeme J. Hankey | Zendy; Konrad Jamrozik | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Validity of Self-Reported versus Hospital-Coded Diagnosis of Stroke: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study

Author(s) -

Euzebiusz Jamrozik,

Zoë Hyde,

Helman Alfonso,

Leon Flicker,

Osvaldo P. Almeida,

Bu B. Yeap,

Paul E. Norman,

Graeme J. Hankey,

Konrad Jamrozik

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

cerebrovascular diseases

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221

H-Index - 104

eISSN - 1421-9786

pISSN - 1015-9770

DOI - 10.1159/000358583

Subject(s) - medicine , stroke (engine) , medical record , cohort , population , medical history , cross sectional study , cohort study , pediatrics , physical therapy , mechanical engineering , environmental health , pathology , engineering

Population-based studies, as well as clinicians, often rely on self-report and hospital records to obtain a history of stroke. This study aimed to compare the validity of the diagnosis of stroke by self-report and by hospital coding according to their cross-sectional association with prevalent vascular risk factors, and longitudinal association with recurrent stroke and major cardiovascular outcomes in a large cohort of older Australian men.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research