z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
EBUS-TBNA with ROSE-Tinted Spectacles?
Author(s) -
Georgia Hardavella,
Neal Navani
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
respiration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.264
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1423-0356
pISSN - 0025-7931
DOI - 10.1159/000355085
Subject(s) - medicine , rose (mathematics) , optometry , ophthalmology , mathematics , geometry
We also note that Oki et al. [1] reported that the negative predictive value was 40% in the ROSE group and 63% in the nonROSE group. One may expect ROSE to improve negative predictive value and make a negative diagnosis more reliable; however, this seems not to be the case and merits further discussion. The number of passes before a node is classified as negative by ROSE requires clarification. The authors state that ROSE was performed by a cytotechnologist present in the endoscopy suite. We would like to draw attention to that as the routine presence of a cytotechnologist or pathologist in the endoscopy room would significantly increase the cost of an EBUS-TBNA procedure, while there is lack of available efficacy data in meaningful endpoints such as the sensitivity, safety or utility of samples for advanced diagnostics.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom