Treatment of Renal Disease: From Where Does the Opposite View Come?
Author(s) -
Assem K. El-Sherif
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
nephron clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1660-2110
DOI - 10.1159/000319592
Subject(s) - medicine , observational study , nephrology , epistemology , disease , kidney disease , clinical practice , intensive care medicine , family medicine , philosophy
Professor A.M. El Nahas has recently called for submitting articles concerned with the opposite view in nephrology practice. His call drew attention to several areas of controversy in the art. Also, it brought to mind a question about how an 'opposite view' emanates in a practice that ought to be based on experimental research and rigorous observational studies. This short input addresses the question of how nephrologists decide about management of their renal patients when the literature fails to grant an unequivocal answer to what they should do. It particularly focuses on the need to carefully read the existing literature and to appreciate its limitations. Also, it highlights the iterative nature of controversies in therapy of renal disease and how a controversy evolves into an 'opposite view'.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom