Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anastrozole versus Tamoxifen in Adjuvant Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer – A Health-Economic Analysis Based on the 100-Month Analysis of the ATAC Trial and the German Health System
Author(s) -
Michael P. Lux,
Achim Wöckel,
Ágnes Benedict,
Stefan Buchholz,
Noémi Kreif,
Nadia Harbeck,
R. Kreienberg,
Manfred Kaufmann,
Matthias W. Beckmann,
W. Jonat,
Peyman Hadji,
W. Distler,
Guenther Raab,
Hans Tesch,
Georg Weyers,
Kurt Possinger,
Andreas Schneeweiß
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
onkologie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1423-0240
pISSN - 0378-584X
DOI - 10.1159/000286233
Subject(s) - anastrozole , tamoxifen , medicine , breast cancer , oncology , aromatase inhibitor , quality adjusted life year , adjuvant therapy , clinical trial , randomized controlled trial , gynecology , cost effectiveness , cancer , risk analysis (engineering)
In the 'Arimidex', Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial, the aromatase inhibitor (AI) anastrozole had a significantly better efficacy and safety profile than tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC) in postmenopausal patients. To compare the combined long-term clinical and economic benefits, we carried out a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of anastrozole versus tamoxifen based on the data of the 100month analysis of the ATAC trial from the perspective of the German public health insurance.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom