Blood Donation, Payment, and Non-Cash Incentives: Classical Questions Drawing Renewed Interest
Author(s) -
Alena Buyx
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
transfusion medicine and hemotherapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.971
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1660-3818
pISSN - 1660-3796
DOI - 10.1159/000235608
Subject(s) - compromise , donation , incentive , cash , payment , altruism (biology) , perspective (graphical) , public economics , order (exchange) , blood donor , organ donation , business , work (physics) , actuarial science , economics , finance , microeconomics , medicine , law , political science , psychology , surgery , social psychology , economic growth , computer science , transplantation , engineering , immunology , artificial intelligence , mechanical engineering
Blood is scarce, and ensuring a sufficient blood supply remains difficult for many countries. Payment for blood as a strategy to increase donations has remained highly controversial for decades, and the debate about ethical issues in paying donors has become somewhat stuck. At least from a policy perspective, it is important to find a compromise which allows for devising and implementing acceptable and successful policies to increase the blood supply. In this paper, such a compromise is developed both from a theoretical and empirical perspective, namely implementing well-designed non-cash incentives which cut across the rigid dichotomy of altruistic donations versus payment for donations. In order for this compromise to work, more attention to donation motives, the choice architecture, and the setting in blood donation needs to be paid.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom