Biases in Measuring the Brain: The Trouble with the Telencephalon
Author(s) -
Lara D. LaDage,
Timothy C. Roth,
Vladimir V. Pravosudov
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
brain behavior and evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.05
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1421-9743
pISSN - 0006-8977
DOI - 10.1159/000225623
Subject(s) - cerebrum , hippocampus , neuroscience , hippocampal formation , brain size , psychology , central nervous system , medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology
When correlating behavior with particular brain regions thought responsible for the behavior, a different region of the brain is usually measured as a control region. This technique is often used to relate spatial processes with the hippocampus, while concomitantly controlling for overall brain changes by measuring the remainder of the telencephalon. We have identified two methods in the literature (the HOM and TTM) that estimate the volume of the telencephalon, although the majority of studies are ambiguous regarding the method employed in measuring the telencephalon. Of these two methods, the HOM might produce an artificial correlation between the telencephalon and the hippocampus, and this bias could result in a significant overestimation of the relative hippocampal volume and a significant underestimation of the telencephalon volume, both of which are regularly used in large comparative analyses. We suggest that future studies should avoid this method and all studies should explicitly delineate the procedures used when estimating brain volumes.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom