z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Deficiency of Eosinophil Peroxidase Detected by Automated Cytochemistry
Author(s) -
Maria Dolores Vaidés,
M. A. Calero
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
acta haematologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1421-9662
pISSN - 0001-5792
DOI - 10.1159/000205890
Subject(s) - cytochemistry , peroxidase , eosinophil , eosinophil peroxidase , immunology , biology , pathology , chemistry , medicine , biochemistry , enzyme , asthma
Maria Dolores Valdés, MD, Servicio de Hematología, Hospital ‘Primero de Octubre’, Carretera de Andalucía, Km. 5, E-28041 Madrid (Spain) Eosinophil and neutrophil/monocyte peroxidases differ in biochemical [1], antigenic [2] and functional characteristics [3] and in genetic control. Individuals with inherited deficiency of neutrophil/monocyte peroxidase [4, 5] have normal levels of eosinophil peroxidase. Eosinophil peroxidase deficiency with normal levels of the neutrophil enzyme has seldom been reported [6]. We report a patient in whom a selective deficiency of eosinophil peroxidase was detected by flow cytochemistry (Technicon H-6000). A 62-year-old woman was diagnosed as having toxic epidemic syndrome (TES) in June, 1981. Leukocyte count was 11.7 × 109/1 with a 10% eosinophils. In November 1983, when she was seen at our hospital, the H-6000 report of her peripheral blood showed 6.79 × 109 leukocytes/1 with 37.6% neutrophils, 26.6% lymphocytes, 33.4% monocytes, 0.3% eosinophils, 1.5% basophils and 0.6% large unstained cells. However, the peripheral smear revealed only 8% monocytes and 30% eosinophils. Two years later the same abnormality was still present. Her eosinophils gave a negative reaction for peroxidase using benzidine di-hydrochloride [7] and for Sudan black B. Neutrophils and monocytes reacted normally to both techniques. The patient refused further testing and no family studies could be performed. We interpret those results as a congenital or acquired partial deficiency of eosinophil peroxidase. The abnormal eosinophils are read as ‘monocytes’ by the H-6000 (large cells with little peroxidase). Some peroxidase must be reacting in the eosinophils although there is none detectable by optical cytochemistry using benzidine dihydrochloride. Eosinophilia was a marker for TES [8]. The eosinophils in this disease are similar in optical morphology to those found in our patient. However, no cytochem-ical abnormalities have been reported in TES. Only 0.17% of patients with TES had more than 1 × 109 eo-sinophils/1 4 years after diagnosis. Neutrophil peroxidase deficiency has been increasingly recognised by automated flow cytochemistry [4, 5]. Optical screening of peripheral smears of patients with low numbers of eosinophils and mildly elevated numbers of monocytes and/or large unstained cells by flow cytochemistry may reveal other cases of eosinophil peroxidase deficiency. References Migler, R.; DeChatelet, R.: Human eosinophilic peroxidase: biochemical characterization. Biochem. Med. 19: 16–26(1978).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom