z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Open-Access Upper GI Endoscopy in the 21st Century
Author(s) -
Mattijs E. Numans
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
digestion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.882
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1421-9867
pISSN - 0012-2823
DOI - 10.1159/000110683
Subject(s) - endoscopy , medicine , gastroenterology
inspired GPs in the Netherlands and other countries to establish open access to especially upper GI endoscopy without referring patients to secondary care. Our Dutch experience with open-access endoscopy in the 1980s showed that the increase in endoscopies is a more or less autonomous process, taking place in primary as well as in secondary care. Although one would hypothesize that open-access upper GI endoscopy would mainly be used to exclude malignancy, open-access endoscopies appeared to show relatively more often diseases that can be treated in primary care too [3, 4] . As shown by van Kerkhoven et al. [this issue], developments in upper GI symptom management and treatment over the following decade caused changes in endoscopic findings that are in line with expectations. New developments like empirical (short-term) treatment with PPI and Helicobacter pylori eradication have reduced peptic ulcers and the relative amount of GERD-related abnormalities has increased by eliminating H. pylorirelated peptic ulcers and functional disease before endoscopy is performed. From a primary care perspective open-access upper GI endoscopy would mainly be used to exclude malignancy in patients with persisting or presumed alarming symptoms or in patients otherwise at risk for developing malignancy. Ideally adequate referral for endoscopy from primary care thus would lead to an increase in early diagnosis of malignancy as well as to a relatively large group of patients adequately reassured that their symptoms are of a benign origin. However, alarm symptoms do only Primary health care in many parts of Western Europe has evolved over the past 30 years. More and more casedriven ‘surgery hours’ by single-handed physicians have been replaced by well-organized, evidence-based working, multidisciplinary group practices. Well-educated ‘specialized’ general practitioners (GPs), aware of their crucial position in health care, are taking care of 90% of the questions presented in primary care. GPs serve as well-recognized and respected gate-keepers and health consultants for many patients trying to find their way through increasingly complicated health care in many countries. Primary care-oriented guidelines have been developed in many clinical fields and nowadays GPs often develop these guidelines together with consultants and specialists. Primary care gastroenterology has evolved together with these developments. As soon as adequate and safe acid-reducing medication became available, primary care physicians were prescribing it because empirical treatment worked. While discussion focused on potential postponement of the diagnosis of malignancy caused by uncontrolled use of H2RA or PPI in primary care, openaccess endoscopy was developed primarily in the UK by the end of the 1970s [1] . Although the first experiments mainly reported an increase in the amount of endoscopies not justified by the relevance of pathology found, quality of referrals slowly improved partly due to involvement of a group of GPs educated and licensed to perform diagnostic endoscopies in hospitals [2] . These examples Published online: November 6, 2007

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom