Book Reviews

There are two things that really attracted my attention to this book; they were the phrases ‘transformative potential’ and ‘learning from across countries’. Many studies on children and young people’s participation have claimed that it is empowering, while others have doubted this empowerment. Therefore, the book’s reference to transformative potential was eye-catching and uplifting for me. I also liked the idea that the book presents, i.e. we can learn lessons about children’s participation in other countries. The book’s 12 chapters present studies predominantly from the Global South (Brazil, India, South Africa) and the UK, and the case studies were written by academics and practitioners. The book focuses on children’s right to be heard collectively as a group with an emphasis on the impact of such participation. The case studies range from participation at community level, municipal and state level, to the national level. This is the strongest highlight of the book as it enables the reader to see participation across different societal levels, and more importantly to determine the impact of such participation, referred to in the book as ‘transformative participation’. According to the authors the transformative potential of children’s participation can be achieved at (1) an individual level for children, young people and/or adults; (2) political and institutional structures; and (3) in attitudes, values and cultural practices. Tracing the history of participation in social movements in the 1960s and 1970s, the authors argue that ‘participation was intertwined with transformation’ (p.22). Thus participation was expected to lead to transformation of social relations and practices that caused social exclusion. With this principle underpinning the book, the authors argue that if participation enables those with power to maintain the status quo then the transformative objective of participation is defeated. The authors engaged in a critical discussion of what it means to be ‘transformative’ and caution against the myth of a simple and automatic linear process between ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘transformation’. However, I found the discussion somewhat conflated, especially when ‘empowerment’ was described as ‘transformative participation’. Whereas the authors note a close connection between ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘transformation’, they did not discuss the nature of such a connection. They also did not discuss what they meant by ‘empowerment’, thereby falling into the myth that everyone understands empowerment. To their credit, they acknowledged that defining empowerment was challenging since there are many definitions of it (p.28). Nonetheless, it would have been useful to discuss which definition(s) they had adopted. Most evaluations of children’s participation tend to be immediately after or during the project, but this book presents some case studies that have sought to evaluate the longterm impact of participation. Chapter 7 presents an example of the transformative impact of participation with interviews of 3 former participants of a children’s rights programme in India. What I liked about this case study is that it is an impact evaluation that was undertaken