English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objective. The objective is to compare parameters related to lens position measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in patients with senile cataract and perform a consistency analysis. Methods. This prospective study included 102 patients (102 eyes) scheduled for simple cataract surgery. Among the total patients, 44 were men, and 58 were women. AS-OCT (sitting) and UBM (lying) were used to measure the anterior chamber depth (ACD) in horizontal and vertical orientations and the iris-lens contact distance (ILCD) and iris-lens angle (ILA) in inferior, superior, nasal, and temporal quadrants. Paired-sample t-test was used to compare ACD, ILCD, and ILA measurements of the two methods, while Pearson’s linear correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to analyze the correlation and consistency of the two results. Results. The horizontal (2.499 ± 0.464 mm) and vertical (2.531 ± 0.463 mm) ACD measured using AS-OCT and the horizontal (2.556 ± 0.467 mm) and vertical (2.563 ± 0.479 mm) ACD measured using UBM were significantly different ( P &lt; 0.001 ); moreover, the results showed good correlation and agreement. A significant difference was observed between the two methods in terms of ILCD measured in inferior, superior, nasal, and temporal quadrants ( P &lt; 0.001 ), and a significant correlation was found between measurements of both methods ( P &lt; 0.001 ). Approximately 3.92% (4/102), 0.98% (1/102), 3.92% (4/102), and 2.94% (3/102) of points were outside the 95% limits of agreement in the four quadrants, respectively, and the agreement of the results was good. ILA measured using both methods differed in inferior, superior, nasal, and temporal quadrants ( P = 0.003 , 0.011, 0.001, 0.001, respectively), and the correlation was good ( P &lt; 0.001 ). The percentage of points outside the 95% limit was higher in inferior, superior, nasal, and temporal quadrants (4.90% (5/102), 5.88% (6/102), 5.88% (6/102), and 6.86% (7/102)) with poor agreement of the results. Conclusions. The correlation between AS-OCT and UBM in terms of measuring lens position-related parameters was good, but the agreement was unstable. The differences in measurement position (sitting and supine) and/or measurement methods (optics and ultrasound) may lead to variability in results.

Comparison of Ocular Morphological Parameters Related to Lens Position by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy