Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth
Author(s) -
Jusuf Lukarcanin,
İsmail Serhat Sadıkoğlu,
Bilal Yaşa,
Murat Türkün,
Murat Türkün
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
international journal of biomaterials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.576
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1687-8795
pISSN - 1687-8787
DOI - 10.1155/2022/6643825
Subject(s) - flexural strength , molar , dentistry , positive control , materials science , orthodontics , negative control , medicine , composite material , traditional medicine
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the physical properties of endodontically treated teeth restored with five different restorative techniques and materials. Hundred and forty extracted human molar teeth were used. In addition to five restoration groups, specimens with no restorations were used as the negative control, and intact molar teeth were used as the positive control. For flexural strength tests, material specimens were made from 5 different materials using a mould according to ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA revealed that the fracture resistance was significantly affected by the restoration type. SFRC group showed the best fracture resistance values, while lowest values were seen in the GWF group. The test results of flexural strength showed values between 140 and 184 MPa and modulus of elasticity between 6.33 and 18.89 GPa ( p < 0.05 ). Under the limits of this study, results showed that SFRC can be used to increase the fracture resistance of ETT.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom