Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST) in Assessing Fall-Risk Home Hazards for Stroke Using Technologies over a Conventional Home Visit
Author(s) -
Husna Ahmad Ainuddin,
Muhammad Hibatullah Romli,
Tengku Aizan Hamid,
Mazatulfazura SF Salim,
Hazwan Mat Din,
Lynette Mackenzie
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
occupational therapy international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.414
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1557-0703
pISSN - 0966-7903
DOI - 10.1155/2022/6044182
Subject(s) - inter rater reliability , reliability (semiconductor) , telehealth , adaptation (eye) , test (biology) , medicine , psychology , applied psychology , telemedicine , rating scale , developmental psychology , health care , power (physics) , physics , paleontology , quantum mechanics , neuroscience , economics , biology , economic growth
Objective. This study is aimed at translating the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST) into the three main languages spoken in Malaysia and investigating its reliability through an alternative technology-based evaluation. Methods. Translation into three languages and cross-cultural adaptation of the HOME FAST was conducted via the five steps adopted from the Mapi Institute. For interrater reliability, occupational therapists who attended a face-to-face home hazard workshop were recruited. Each therapist rated the HOME FAST by using the provided combination of videos and photographs of stroke survivors manoeuvring in their home. For test-retest reliability, the same occupational therapists were invited to rate the same combination of photographs and videos again. Reliability was analysed using Gwet’s A C 1 and Bland and Altman’s plot to describe agreement. Results. The translation challenges were minimal and rectifiable. A Bahasa Melayu, Mandarin, and Tamil versions of the HOME FAST were developed. Overall interrater reliability for both video ( A C 1 = 0.91 ) and photograph ( A C 1 = 0.91 ) were good. The test-retest reliability yielded similar outcome (video: overall A C 1 = 0.92 and photograph: overall A C 1 = 0.93 ). Conclusion. Using alternative technology (video and photograph) to do a home hazard assessment was feasible. However, the asynchronous nature of these methods has limitations in clarifying certain aspects in the home. Moving forward, potential investigation on other technologies such as telehealth for synchronous and real-time interaction is warranted.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom