z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Impact of China’s Lockdown Policy on the Incidence of COVID-19: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Author(s) -
Mooketsi Molefi,
John Thato Tlhakanelo,
Thabo Phologolo,
Shimeles Genna Hamda,
Tiny Masupe,
Billy Tsima,
Vincent Setlhare,
Yohana Mashalla,
Douglas J. Wiebe
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
biomed research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 126
eISSN - 2314-6141
pISSN - 2314-6133
DOI - 10.1155/2021/9498029
Subject(s) - interrupted time series , covid-19 , interrupted time series analysis , incidence (geometry) , confidence interval , counterfactual thinking , china , demography , medicine , statistics , time series , pandemic , mathematics , geography , outbreak , psychological intervention , psychology , virology , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty) , social psychology , geometry , archaeology , psychiatry , sociology
Background Policy changes are often necessary to contain the detrimental impact of epidemics such as those brought about by coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In the earlier phases of the emergence of COVID-19, China was the first to impose strict restrictions on movement (lockdown) on January 23rd, 2020. A strategy whose effectiveness in curtailing COVID-19 was yet to be determined. We, therefore, sought to study the impact of the lockdown in reducing the incidence of COVID-19.Methods Daily cases of COVID-19 that occurred in China which were registered between January 12th and March 30th, 2020, were extracted from the Johns Hopkins CSSE team COVID-19 ArcGIS® dashboards. Daily cases reported were used as data points in the series. Two interrupted series models were run: one with an interruption point of 23 January 2020 (model 1) and the other with a 14-day deferred interruption point of 6th February (model 2). For both models, the magnitude of change (before and after) and linear trend analyses were measured, and β -coefficients reported with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the precision.Results Seventy-eight data points were used in the analysis. There was an 11% versus a 163% increase in daily cases in models 1 and 2, respectively, in the preintervention periods ( p ≤ 0.001). Comparing the period immediately following the intervention points to the counterfactual, there was a daily increase of 2,746% ( p < 0.001) versus a decline of 207% ( p = 0.802) in model 2. However, in both scenarios, there was a statistically significant drop in the daily cases predicted for this data and beyond when comparing the preintervention periods and postintervention periods ( p < 0.001).Conclusion There was a significant decrease the COVID-19 daily cases reported in China following the institution of a lockdown, and therefore, lockdown may be used to curtail the burden of COVID-19.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom