z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Intervention of WeChat Group Guidance in Rapid Rehabilitation after Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
Author(s) -
Jing Wang,
Yingying Lin,
Ying Wei,
Xiuying Chen,
Yuping Wang,
Longxin Zhang,
Min Zhou
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of healthcare engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.509
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 2040-2309
pISSN - 2040-2295
DOI - 10.1155/2021/8914997
Subject(s) - intervention (counseling) , medicine , rehabilitation , physical therapy , gynecological surgery , rating scale , inclusion and exclusion criteria , laparoscopic surgery , quality of life (healthcare) , laparoscopy , surgery , nursing , psychology , alternative medicine , developmental psychology , pathology
Gynecological laparoscopic surgery is the current routine treatment. Although the injury is relatively small, it is still a traumatic operation and also increases the recovery speed of patients. This paper mainly explores the intervention effect of rapid rehabilitation after gynecological laparoscopic surgery by means of WeChat group guidance based on the information adoption model and UTAUT model. Gynecological patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and met the inclusion and exclusion conditions in a provincial maternal and child health hospital were selected as the research objects. The WeChat intervention group was compared with the nonintervention group, and the oral description score (VRS), comfort score (BCS), and 40-item recovery quality rating scale (QoR-40) were used as the scoring criteria. The results showed that the postoperative VRS and BCS scores in the WeChat intervention group were significantly lower than those in the nonintervention group. The total score of QoR-40 in both groups decreased compared with that before operation, reached the lowest on the first day after operation, and began to rise from the second day. This result is consistent with the patient's postoperative recovery process. After operation, the total score of the WeChat intervention group on days 1 and 2 was higher than that of the non-WeChat intervention group. By comparing the results of the patient's postoperative oral description score (VRS), comfort score (BCS), 40-item recovery quality score scale (QoR-40), etc., it can be shown that the overall recovery quality of the WeChat intervention group was better during these two days. In each section, the oral description score (VRS) and the 40-item recovery quality score scale (QoR-40) indicated that the pain sensation and emotional state scores of patients in the WeChat intervention group were higher than those in the nonintervention group, while the comfort score (BCS) was lower, indicating better comfort in the WeChat intervention group.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom