Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms
Author(s) -
Qianru Xu,
Chaoxiong Ye,
Simeng Gu,
Zhonghua Hu,
Yi Lei,
Xueyan Li,
Lihui Huang,
Qiang Liu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
neural plasticity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.288
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 2090-5904
pISSN - 1687-5443
DOI - 10.1155/2021/8851066
Subject(s) - psychology , working memory , cognitive psychology , cognition , stimulus (psychology) , attentional bias , cognitive neuroscience , neuroscience
Visual attention and visual working memory (VWM) are two major cognitive functions in humans, and they have much in common. A growing body of research has investigated the effect of emotional information on visual attention and VWM. Interestingly, contradictory findings have supported both a negative bias and a positive bias toward emotional faces (e.g., angry faces or happy faces) in the attention and VWM fields. We found that the classical paradigms—that is, the visual search paradigm in attention and the change detection paradigm in VWM—are considerably similar. The settings of these paradigms could therefore be responsible for the contradictory results. In this paper, we compare previous controversial results from behavioral and neuroscience studies using these two paradigms. We suggest three possible contributing factors that have significant impacts on the contradictory conclusions regarding different emotional bias effects; these factors are stimulus choice, experimental setting, and cognitive process. We also propose new research directions and guidelines for future studies.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom