Resin Composite Materials for Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations: A Comparison of Selected Mechanical Properties
Author(s) -
Wojciech Grzebieluch,
Marcin Mikulewicz,
Urszula Kaczmarek
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of healthcare engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.509
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 2040-2309
pISSN - 2040-2295
DOI - 10.1155/2021/8828954
Subject(s) - flexural strength , weibull modulus , flexural modulus , materials science , composite material , three point flexural test , indentation hardness , composite number , elastic modulus , modulus , young's modulus , weibull distribution , mathematics , microstructure , statistics
Objective The aim was to evaluate the flexural strength, flexural modulus, microhardness, Weibull modulus, and characteristic strength of six resin composite blocks (Grandio Blocs-GR, Tetric CAD-TE, Brilliant Crios-CR, Katana Avencia-AV, Cerasmart-CS, and Shofu Block HC-HC).Methods Flexural strength and flexural modulus were measured using a three-point bending test and microhardness using the Vickers method. Weibull analysis was also performed.Results The materials showed flexural strength ranging from 120.38 (HC) to 186.02 MPa (GR), flexural modulus from 8.26 (HC) to 16.95 GPa (GR), and microhardness from 70.85 (AV) to 140.43 (GR). Weibull modulus and characteristic strength ranged from 16.35 (CS) to 34.98 (TE) and from 123.45 MPa (HC) to 190.3 MPa (GR), respectively.Conclusions GR, TE, and CR presented significantly higher flexural strength, modulus, Weibull modulus, and characteristic strength than the others.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom