Hydrological Models and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to Simulate Streamflow in a Tropical Catchment of Sri Lanka
Author(s) -
Miyuru B. Gunathilake,
Chamaka Karunanayake,
Anura S. Gunathilake,
Niranga Marasingha,
Jayanga T. Samarasinghe,
Isuru M. Bandara,
Upaka Rathnayake
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
applied computational intelligence and soft computing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.371
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1687-9732
pISSN - 1687-9724
DOI - 10.1155/2021/6683389
Subject(s) - streamflow , artificial neural network , hydrological modelling , context (archaeology) , computer science , drainage basin , sri lanka , flood forecasting , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , climatology , artificial intelligence , geography , geology , cartography , environmental planning , tanzania , geotechnical engineering , archaeology
Accurate streamflow estimations are essential for planning and decision-making of many development activities related to water resources. Hydrological modelling is a frequently adopted and a matured technique to simulate streamflow compared to the data driven models such as artificial neural networks (ANNs). In addition, usage of ANNs is minimum to simulate streamflow in the context of Sri Lanka. )erefore, this study presents an intercomparison between streamflow estimations from conventional hydrological modelling and ANN analysis for Seethawaka River Basin located in the upstream part of the Kelani River Basin, Sri Lanka. )e hydrological model was developed using the Hydrologic Engineering Centre-Hydrologic Modelling System (HECHMS), while the data-driven ANN model was developed in MATLAB. )e rainfall and streamflows’ data for 2003–2010 period have been used. )e simulations by HEC-HMS were performed by four types of input rainfall data configurations, including observed rainfall data sets and three satellite-based precipitation products (SbPPs), namely, PERSIANN, PERSIANN-CCS, and PERSIANN-CDR.)e ANNmodel was trained using three well-known training algorithms, namely, Levenberg–Marquadt (LM), Bayesian regularization (BR), and scaled conjugate gradient (SCG). Results revealed that the simulated hydrological model based on observed rainfall outperformed those of based on remotely sensed SbPPs. BR algorithm-based ANN algorithm was found to be superior among the data-driven models in the context of ANNmodel simulations. However, none of the above developed models were able to capture several peak discharges recorded in the Seethawaka River. )e results of this study indicate that ANNmodels can be used to simulate streamflow to an acceptable level, despite presence of intensive spatial and temporal data sets, which are often required for hydrologic software. Hence, the results of the current study provide valuable feedback for water resources’ planners in the developing region which lack multiple data sets for hydrologic software.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom