z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals
Author(s) -
Li Zhang,
Geng Liu,
Bing Han,
Yuzhou Yan,
Junhua Fei,
Jianbing Ma,
Yunfei Zhang
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
applied bionics and biomechanics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.397
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1754-2103
pISSN - 1176-2322
DOI - 10.1155/2021/6231406
Subject(s) - osteoarthritis , medicine , ankle , gait , gait cycle , correlation , radiography , orthodontics , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , surgery , mathematics , geometry , pathology , physics , alternative medicine , kinematics , classical mechanics
Malalignment of the lower limbs is the main biomechanical factor for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The static hip-knee-ankle angle (S-HKAA) measured from radiograph is regarded as the “gold standard” of the malalignment. However, many evidences showed that the S-HKAA has no significant correlation with the knee dynamic-load distribution, unlike the dynamic HKAA (D-HKAA). The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the D-HKAA and investigate the relationship between D-HKAA and S-HKAA for both KOA and healthy participants. In this paper, twenty-five healthy subjects and twenty-five medial compartment KOA (M-KOA) patients were recruited. Three-dimensional motion analysis and standing lower-limbs-full-length radiograph were utilized to obtain the D-HKAA and S-HKAA, respectively. The results showed that the mean D-HKAA was more varus than the S-HKAA ( p < 0.05). For the mean D-HKAA, larger varus angle was observed in swing phase than stance phase ( p < 0.05). Compared with healthy subjects, the M-KOA patients had remarkably smaller S-HKAA and D-HKAA during gait cycle ( p < 0.01). For the relationship between the S-HKAA and mean D-HKAA, no significant correlation was found for both healthy subjects and M-KOA patients ( r < 0.357, n = 25, p > 0.05, Spearman correlation analysis). In conclusion, the S-HKAA was limited to predict the D-HKAA for both M-KOA patients and healthy subjects. The D-HKAA should be given more attention to the orthopedist and the designer of knee brace and orthotics.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom