Study on Model Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm vs. Filter Back Projection Algorithm for Diagnosis of Acute Cerebral Infarction Using CT Images
Author(s) -
Songlin Tang,
Yan Liu,
Zhifu Wang,
Yajie Liu,
Huafei Liu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of healthcare engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.509
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 2040-2309
pISSN - 2040-2295
DOI - 10.1155/2021/5000102
Subject(s) - algorithm , medicine , iterative reconstruction , nuclear medicine , cerebral blood flow , perfusion scanning , tomography , perfusion , radiology , mathematics
The aim was to explore the application value of computed tomography (CT) perfusion (CTP) imaging based on the iterative model reconstruction (IMR) in the diagnosis of acute cerebral infarction (ACI). 80 patients with ACI, admitted to hospital, were selected as the research objects and divided randomly into a routine treatment group (group A) and a low-dose group (group B) (each group with 40 patients). Patients in group A were scanned at 80 kV–150 mAs, and the traditional filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm was employed to reconstruct the images; besides, 80 kV–30 mAs was adopted to scan the patients in group B, and the images were reconstructed by IMR1, IMR2, IMR3, iDose4 (a kind of hybrid iterative reconstruction technology), and FBP, respectively. The application values of different algorithms were evaluated by CTP based on the collected CTP images of patients and detecting indicators. The results showed that the gray and white matter CT value, SD value, SNR, CNR, and subjective image scores of patients in group B were basically consistent with those of group A ( p > 0.05) after the IMR1 reconstruction, and the CT and SD of gray and white matter in patients from group B reduced steeply ( p < 0.05), while SNR and CNR increased dramatically after IMR2 and IMR3 reconstruction in contrast to group A ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, the cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), mean transit time (MTT) of contrast agent, and time to peak (TTP) of contrast agent in patients from group B after iDose4 and IMR reconstruction were basically the same as those of group A ( p > 0.05). Therefore, IMR combined with low-dose CTP could obtain high-quality CTP images of the brain with stable perfusion indicators and low radiation dose, which could be clinically applied in the diagnosis of ACI.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom