z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Analytical versus Metaheuristic Methods to Extract the Photovoltaic Cells and Panel Parameters
Author(s) -
Daniel Tudor Cotfas,
Petru Adrian Cotfas,
Mihai Oproiu,
Paul A. Ostafe
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of photoenergy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1687-529X
pISSN - 1110-662X
DOI - 10.1155/2021/3608138
Subject(s) - metaheuristic , photovoltaic system , genetic algorithm , discretization , algorithm , voltage , computer science , mean squared error , power (physics) , mathematical optimization , mathematics , statistics , engineering , mathematical analysis , physics , quantum mechanics , electrical engineering
The parameters of the photovoltaic cells and panels are very important to forecast the power generated. There are a lot of methods to extract the parameters using analytical, metaheuristic, and hybrid algorithms. The comparison between the widely used analytical method and some of the best metaheuristic algorithms from the algorithm families is made for datasets from the specialized literature, using the following statistical tests: absolute error, root mean square error, and the coefficient of determination. The equivalent circuit and mathematical model considered is the single diode model. The result comparison shows that the metaheuristic algorithms have the best performance in almost all cases, and only for the genetic algorithm, there are poorer results for one chosen photovoltaic cell. The parameters of the photovoltaic cells and panels and also the current-voltage characteristic for real outdoor weather conditions are forecasted using the parameters calculated with the best method: one for analytical—the five-parameter analytical method—and one for the metaheuristic algorithms—hybrid successive discretization algorithm. Additionally, the genetic algorithm is used. The forecast current-voltage characteristic is compared with the one measured in real sunlight conditions, and the best results are obtained in the case of a hybrid successive discretization algorithm. The maximum power forecast using the calculated parameters with the five-parameter method is the best, and the error in comparison with the measured ones is 0.48%.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom