z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand
Author(s) -
Udomchai Techavipoo,
Nattawut Sinsuebphon,
Sakunrat Prompalit,
Saowapak S. Thongvigitmanee,
W. Narkbuakaew,
Atthasak Kiang-ia,
Tanapon Srivongsa,
P. Thajchayapong,
Utairat Chaumrattanakul
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
biomed research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 126
eISSN - 2314-6141
pISSN - 2314-6133
DOI - 10.1155/2021/3102673
Subject(s) - image quality , grayscale , imaging phantom , medicine , digital radiography , radiography , contrast (vision) , nuclear medicine , radiology , artificial intelligence , medical physics , computer science , pixel , image (mathematics)
Background The National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) in Thailand researched and prototyped digital radiography systems under the brand name BodiiRay aiming for sustainable development and affordability of medical imaging technology. The image restoration and enhancement were implemented for the systems.Purpose The image quality of the systems was evaluated using images from phantoms and from healthy volunteers.Methods The survey phantom images from BodiiRay and other two commercial systems using the exposure settings for the chest, the abdomen, and the extremity were evaluated by three experience observers in terms of the high-contrast image resolution, the low-contrast image detectability, and the grayscale differentiation. The volunteer images of the chests, the abdomens, and the extremities from BodiiRay were evaluated by three specialized radiologists based on visual grading on 5-point scaled questionnaires for the anatomy visibility, the image quality satisfaction, and the diagnosis confidence in using the images.Results BodiiRay phantom results were similar to those from the commercial systems. The overall performance averaged across the exposure settings showed that BodiiRay was slightly better than Fujifilm FDR Go in the low-contrast detectability ( p = 0.033) and in the grayscale differentiation ( p = 0.004). It was also slightly better than Siemens YSIO Max in the high-contrast resolution ( p = 0.018). The images of chest, pelvis, and hand phantoms illustrated comparable visual quality. For volunteer images, the percentage of the images scored ≥4 ranged from 61% to 99%, 23% to 92%, and 96% to 99% for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively. The average score ranged from 3.63 to 4.46, 3.18 to 4.21, and 4.41 to 4.51 for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively.Conclusion The phantom image results showed the comparability of these systems. The clinical evaluation showed BodiiRay images provided sufficient image qualities for digital radiography of these body parts.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom