z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Modulation of Working-Memory Performance Using Gamma-Electroacupuncture and Theta-Electroacupuncture in Healthy Adults
Author(s) -
Meng Ren,
Jingjing Xu,
Jingjun Zhao,
Sicong Zhang,
Wenjing Wang,
Shutian Xu,
Zhiqing Zhou,
Xixi Chen,
Songmei Chen,
Yuanli Li,
Chunlei Shan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.552
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1741-4288
pISSN - 1741-427X
DOI - 10.1155/2021/2062718
Subject(s) - electroacupuncture , working memory , crossover study , psychology , audiology , cognition , transcranial direct current stimulation , stimulation , medicine , acupuncture , neuroscience , placebo , alternative medicine , pathology
Working memory (WM), a central component of general cognition, plays an essential role in human beings' daily lives. WM impairments often occur in psychiatric, neurodegenerative, and neurodevelopmental disorders, mainly presenting as loss of high-load WM. In previous research, electroacupuncture (EA) has been shown to be an effective treatment for cognitive impairments. Frequency parameters are an important factor in therapeutic results, but the optimal frequency parameters of EA have not yet been identified. In this study, we chose theta-EA ( θ -EA; 6 Hz) and gamma-EA ( γ -EA; 40 Hz), corresponding to the transcranial alternating-current stimulation (tACS) frequency parameters at the Baihui (DU20) and Shenting (DU24) acupoints, in order to compare the effects of different EA frequencies on WM. We evaluated WM performance using visual 1-back, 2-back, and 3-back WM tasks involving digits. Each participant ( N  = 30) attended three different sessions in accordance with a within-subject crossover design. We performed θ -EA, γ -EA, and sham-EA in a counterbalanced order, conducting the WM task both before and after intervention. The results showed that d-prime (d′) under all three stimulation conditions had no significance in the 1-back and 2-back tasks. However, in the 3-back task, there was a significant improvement in d′ after intervention compared to d′ before intervention under θ -EA (F [1, 29] = 22.64; P < 0.001), while we saw no significant difference in the γ -EA and sham-EA groups. Reaction times for hits (RT-hit) under all three stimulation conditions showed decreasing trends in 1-, 2-, and 3-back tasks but without statistically significant differences. These findings suggest that the application of θ -EA might facilitate high-load WM performance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom