z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pedestrian Heading Estimation Methods Based on Multiple Phone Carrying Modes
Author(s) -
Ying Guo,
Hanshuo Liu,
Jin Ye,
Shengli Wang,
Chenxi Duan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
mobile information systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.346
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1875-905X
pISSN - 1574-017X
DOI - 10.1155/2021/1193268
Subject(s) - heading (navigation) , pedestrian , computer science , phone , dead reckoning , step detection , mobile phone , inertial measurement unit , gyroscope , rotation (mathematics) , artificial intelligence , real time computing , computer vision , simulation , global positioning system , engineering , geography , telecommunications , geodesy , transport engineering , linguistics , philosophy , aerospace engineering
The development of smartphone Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) inertial sensors has provided opportunities to improve indoor navigation and positioning for location-based services. One area of indoor navigation research uses pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) technology, in which the mobile phone must typically be held to the pedestrian’s chest. In this paper, we consider navigation in three other mobile phone carrying modes: “calling,” “pocket,” and “swinging.” For the calling mode, in which the pedestrian holds the phone to their face, the rotation matrix method is used to convert the phone’s gyroscope data from the calling state to the holding state, allowing calculation of the stable pedestrian forward direction. For a phone carried in a pedestrian’s trouser pocket, a heading complementary equation is established based on principal component analysis and rotation approach methods. In this case, the pedestrian heading is calculated by determining a subset of data that avoid 180° directional ambiguity and improve the heading accuracy. For the swinging mode, a heading capture method is used to obtain the heading of the lowest point of the pedestrian’s arm swing as they hold the phone. The direction of travel is then determined by successively adding the heading offsets each time the arm droops. Experimental analysis shows that 95% of the heading errors of the above three methods are less than 5.81°, 10.73°, and 9.22°, respectively. These results present better heading accuracy and reliability.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom