z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
Author(s) -
Mathilde Johansen,
Simon Francis Thomsen
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
international scholarly research notices
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2356-7872
DOI - 10.1155/2016/1346026
Subject(s) - transparency (behavior) , consolidated standards of reporting trials , critical appraisal , quality (philosophy) , medical research , computer science , medicine , medical education , alternative medicine , medical physics , pathology , computer security , philosophy , epistemology
As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom