z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Impact of Insurance and a Usual Source of Care on Emergency Department Use in the United States
Author(s) -
Winston Liaw,
Stephen Petterson,
David L. Rabin,
Andrew Bazemore
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international journal of family medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2090-2042
pISSN - 2090-2050
DOI - 10.1155/2014/842847
Subject(s) - medicaid , medicine , emergency department , ambulatory , family medicine , health insurance , patient protection and affordable care act , ambulatory care , multivariate analysis , health care , nursing , economics , economic growth
Background . Finding a usual source of care (USC) is difficult for certain populations. This analysis determines how insurance type and having a USC affect the settings in which patients seek care. Methods . In this cross-sectional study of the 2000–2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys, we assessed the percentage of low-income persons with half or more of their ambulatory visits to the emergency department (ED). Respondents were stratified based on insurance type and presence of a USC. Results . In 2011, among Medicaid enrollees without USCs, 21.6% had half or more of their ambulatory visits to EDs compared to 8.1% for those with USCs. Among the uninsured without USCs, 24.1% went to an ED for half or more of their ambulatory visits compared to 8.8% for those with USCs in 2011. Among the privately insured without USCs, 7.8% went to an ED for half or more of their ambulatory visits compared to 5.0% for those with USCs in 2011. These differences remained in multivariate analyses. Conclusions . Those who lack USCs, particularly the uninsured and Medicaid enrollees, are more likely to rely on EDs.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom