Seasonality of Freeze Tolerance in a Subarctic Population of the Wood Frog,Rana sylvatica
Author(s) -
Jon P. Costanzo,
M. Clara F. do Amaral,
Andrew J. Rosendale,
Richard Lee
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international journal of zoology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.42
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 1687-8485
pISSN - 1687-8477
DOI - 10.1155/2014/750153
Subject(s) - tree frog , biology , population , freezing tolerance , osmolyte , cryoprotectant , amphibian , dormancy , tiger salamander , ecology , zoology , botany , fishery , biochemistry , germination , larva , embryo , demography , sociology , cryopreservation , gene
We compared physiological characteristics and responses to experimental freezing and thawing in winter and spring samples of the wood frog, Rana sylvatica, indigenous to Interior Alaska, USA. Whereas winter frogs can survive freezing at temperatures at least as low as −16°C, the lower limit of tolerance for spring frogs was between −2.5°C and −5°C. Spring frogs had comparatively low levels of the urea in blood plasma, liver, heart, brain, and skeletal muscle, as well as a smaller hepatic reserve of glycogen, which is converted to glucose after freezing begins. Consequently, following freezing (−2.5°C, 48 h) tissue concentrations of these cryoprotective osmolytes were 44–88% lower than those measured in winter frogs. Spring frogs formed much more ice and incurred extensive cryohemolysis and lactate accrual, indicating that they had suffered marked cell damage and hypoxic stress during freezing. Multiple, interactive stresses, in addition to diminished cryoprotectant levels, contribute to the reduced capacity for freeze tolerance in posthibernal frogs
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom